Sunday, 15 September 2019

X THEORY1 The Auteur Theory

Richard Curtis
DEFINITION
  • The director has a distinctive style (like Tarantino)
  • They tackle social issues
  • Assumption that the director is the creator (ignores the editor and writer etc.)

RICHARD CURTIS (A COUNTER EXAMPLE?)
Screenwriter, film director, film producer, television producer.
Known for Love Actually (2003), Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994) and About Time (2013).  Associated with a subsidiary of a big 5 conglomerate NBC-Universal.  Very successful in commercial terms - his movies don't usually get critically acclaimed!  

...

...
...

...
...

...

Has a distinctive style.  Typically rom-coms (hybrid) with white, middle class, southern English actors.  Doesn't tackle social issues such as racism, sexism, poverty etc. but arguably disguises it therefore he is not considered an auteur.  

However... he's known for working with a mainly female centred genre.  Just as is the case with others such as soap operas and women's magazines, this is considered "trashy".

Filmography

SHANE MEADOWS
Shane Meadows
Director, screenwriter, actor. 
Known for Dead Man's Shoes (2004), This Is England (2006) and TwentyFourSeven (1997).  Associated with an Indie company, Warp.

...

...
...

...
...

...

Has a very distinctive style.  Mainly social realism genre with characters with different representations - e.g. working class, northern English.  Tackles racism, mental health and poverty.

  • fits definition 
  • warp minimal box office
  • win lots of awards
  • flawed and complex protagonist who by the end you sympathise with 
  • low budget 
  • racism, mental health, poverty all included
  • actors with different accents and races
  • social realism genre
  • Dead Man's Shoes - hybrid - psychological thriller and social realist

4 comments:

DB said...

GOOD: clear grasp of the concept;
counter-example as well as exemplar
wider context/commentary on gender representation/patriarchy
good range of terms, with bold+pink
some useful illustration

DEVELOP:
- tidy up Meadows eg generally
- add detail - specific egs, not just implied (good exam revision), with a suitable hyperlink for each
- more specific illustration
- add a sub-heading for 'OTHER AUTEURS' and add a few names! You could do this as a Ppt to easily include images of posters (plural) on a single slide for each
- always think about POSSIBLE INFLUENCES - are there any that MIGHT (possible!) influence YOU? If so, always add this at the top with the same formatting every time for the POSSIBLE INFLUENCES sub-heading.

DB said...

- links list. I won’t repeat this instruction, you need to check each post for this.

Unknown said...

I'm slightly confused with this one

Unknown said...

done